Add your feed to SetSticker.com! Promote your sites and attract more customers. It costs only 100 EUROS per YEAR.

Title


Description

TAG 15/20


Your domain [ rss | feed ]


Pleasant surprises on every page! Discover new articles, displayed randomly throughout the site. Interesting content, always a click away

Discs and stuff

What's Jim up to?

 14 Jun 2022, 2:59 pm

Unsupported QinQ

My work ordered a pair of ExpressRoute circuits to connect our DC to Azure. I was not involved in the sales or requirements discussions, only the “Here’s two circuits make them go” part.

We have a pair of Nexus 9k switches for this location. Azure Private on the MS side is set for VLAN 350. Configure my ports as routed ports on VLAN 350, /30s, etc. No BGP. No ping. No ARP. Hmm.

Work with the carrier who points at MS. Work with MS who points at the carrier. Eventually I dig up a design guide on the carrier’s site explaining that ExpressRoute is delivered as a QinQ service, which makes sense because we could, in theory, have public and private peering over the same circuits.

Unfortunately, since no one ever mentioned this we don’t have any gear laying around that can route at gigabit speeds and has native support for QinQ. So after a few days of research and testing, my workaround was implemented.

ExpressRoute comes into the switch on Eth1/38. This port is set:
switchport
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300 ### The outer VLAN from the carrier ###
switchport trunk allowed vlan 300
switchport trunk native vlan 999 ### Something unused ###

Port 1/35 is configured:
switchport
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
switchport access vlan 300 ### Outer VLAN ###
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable

Port 1/35 is looped to port 1/36, configured:
Eth1/36.350
encapsulation dot1q 350
vrf member azureprivate ### VRF for Azure
ip address a.b.c.d/30

With this in place, 1 out of 2 circuits came up, the one on our ’02’. Moved both circuits to this switch (with a different outer vlan on each), both come up. Move both to the ’01’ switch, neither come up. Work with TAC on why that is, determine for some reason the CPU is getting the double tagged frame before it loops out 1/35 and in 1/36. Slap a static MAC different than the BIA onto 1/36.350 and bam, circuit comes up. Do the same on the other switch for consistency.

Was told by TAC that though they can find looping a 9k to itself for this purpose in any design guide, they also can’t see anything that says it is unsupported or shouldn’t work.

IT introduction 7 Jul 2020, 6:08 pm

After almost 20 years working in the Information Technology field, I can say today that I have an introductory level knowledge of IT.

Long sports weekend 29 Jun 2020, 1:20 pm

Supposed to play street hockey Saturday, got postponed due to rain that never happened. Went to play a round at Stafford Woods with the guys, shot +4 (one of my better rounds).

Sunday morning I drove up north for street hockey, spent about 3 hours in net. Spent another hour or so in net later in the day.

I do not have legs this morning.

Disc golf 23 Jun 2020, 6:04 pm

I’m going to play disc golf after work today.

Page processed in 2.783 seconds.

Loading Offers..
Home Privacy Policy